There have been too many poorly executed and disappointing studies over the years, too many research dollars wasted. Yet it now appears to be horribly flawed.Īt first, I thought this could be the beginning of the end of nutrition science. PREDIMED was supposed to be an example of scientific excellence in a field filled with conflicted and flawed studies. It also republished a new version of PREDIMED, based on a reanalysis of the data that accounted for the missteps. Last June, the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine pulled the original paper from the record, issuing a rare retraction. As Stanford University health researcher (and nutrition science critic) John Ioannidis put it: “It was the best. The study’s delicious conclusion was that eating as the Spanish, Italian, and Greeks do - dousing food in olive oil and loading up on fish, nuts, and fresh produce - cuts cardiovascular disease risk by a third. And in 2013, its scientific cred was secured with PREDIMED, one of the most important recent diet studies published. But in recent decades, one diet has attracted the lion’s share of research dollars and public attention: the Mediterranean way of eating. Researchers’ answers to this question have often been contradictory and confusing. The million-dollar question in nutrition science is this: What should we eat to live a long and healthy life?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |